Archive for the ‘enterprise 2.0’ Category

DNA Computing

Friday, October 20th, 2006

Scientific American reported that the DNA-based computers now can play Tic-Tac-Toe. Why is this a big deal? This is significant not because DNA-computers will all of a sudden replace conventional servers to power the enterprise. Conventional computing started out solving basic binary problems in the 1940s which is now paralleled with the 2002 announcement when DNA biological computers solving similar complexity problems. That was 4 years ago. Now we have a basic “thinking machine” under way. Conventional computing fueled by Moore’s law got us to enterprise class by the 1970s, client server the late 1980s, the web 1.0 by the 1990s.

DNA computing may do for enterprise and web computing what the first genome sequencing did for biotech. The question is what kind of enterprises will emerge as a result. What problems will be solved in new ways? The first applications are obviously biotech - currently targeting disease modeling, like the West-Nile virus. But is there an emergent DNA-Web infrastructure or just better modeling in biotech and nanotech?

The MAYA-II DNA computer:
2143 Web
It even reminds me of the first Sinclair computer from 1982(below).
1-Tmx

Technorati Tags: ,

Salesforce.com the SAP of the Saas World?

Friday, October 20th, 2006

Controversial as usual, Nick Carr’s insight into Salesforce.com’s Apex strategy is still definitely worth pondering. Almost all enterprise technology vendors are fighting for the Ultimate Platform or Infrastructure Utility position. Carr writes:

Now, I understand the rationale for the [salesforce.com's] decision: the infrastructure is the product. While Salesforce’s move opens up new opportunities for the firm, it also dramatically widens the competition it will face. Everyone from Microsoft to Google to Amazon is moving into the business of being an infrastructure utility. And, in an age of standardization, it will be interesting to see how customers react to the idea of running their enterprise applications in a private language. Is Salesforce the SAP of the SaaS world - and is that a good or a bad thing?

So the on-premise world has the choice of IBM’s Websphere, SAP’s Netweaver, Oracle’s Fusion MW and Microsoft .net as the unifying architecture. Of these SAP, Oracle and Microsoft command a dizzying array of 3rd party applications to “plug-in” to the platform and provide both functional richness and flexibility to the offering.

While Oracle and SAP have both on-demand and on-premise offerings Salesforce.com has the entire architecture based on SaaS and therefore did not have platform-play aspirations until this last week. With Apex it is now offering a “Platform through the Web” proposition which will broaden the platform wars that raged primarily on premise.

Maybe winning in Enterprise 2.0 will ultimately be about creating a standard platform that unifies on-premise and on-demand.

Communicating the revolutionary platform change in non-techno speak to the board rooms has been challenging for most CIOs.
Now that we are back in the growth (innovation) stage of the economic cycle in most industries and technology innovation dollars are still consumed by maintaining unwieldy infrastructure in most IT shops, the promise of the Platform, the liberation of process and technology innovation is bigger pressure than ever. Technology and process complexity is the ultimate barrier to growth so most companies will ultimately move to an infrastructure utility and this transition will be very interesting to watch over the next decade being fought out between the on-premise giants and the SaaS challengers.

Th00123

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,